Example Pairing Scientifically Supported
How we score flavor pairings
An honest look at the 5 dimensions we use to evaluate every pairing.
Trust Score Legend
This score reflects all 5 dimensions — not a single authority.
5-Dimensional Breakdown
Every dimension tells a different story of evidence.
Peer-reviewed research, food science databases, molecular analysis.
Culinary traditions, regional usage, cultural practices.
Classical recipes, culinary literature, historical records.
Chef validations, Michelin references, restaurant context.
First-hand observations and user-submitted evidence.
Why we score honestly
When we don't have evidence on a dimension, we say so. No fabricated authority. No inflated scores to look more impressive.
A score of 72 without any chef validation or peer-reviewed source is honest — it tells you what we know and what we don’t. The red bars are features, not failures.
Every great pairing starts as a hypothesis. We track the journey from observation to consensus, and we never skip steps.
Limitations of this pairing
We show limitations because transparency is how we earn trust. Every red bar is a research opportunity.
Are you a professional chef?
Help us validate pairings with your expertise. Contribute your knowledge and join the Ambassadors programme.